Defence of Bachelor’s Thesis

Major: Information and Communication Systems
Code of subject: 6.126.02.O.79
Credits: 3.00
Department: Telecommunication
Lecturer: -
Semester: 8 семестр
Mode of study: денна
Learning outcomes: Bachelor's qualification work defense (publicly before EC).
Required prior and related subjects: All disciplines according to the current curriculum.
Summary of the subject: Bachelor's qualification work defense (publicly before EC).
Assessment methods and criteria: The assessment is carried out by the members of theExamination Commission. To protect allowed work without academic plagiarism and qualitatively executed.Assessment of qualifying work is carried out on a 100-point scale, which consists of two parts: 1) performance of work (up to 70 points) and 2) defense (up to 30 points). The grade "excellent" (94 points) is given if the graduate: 1) performed the work independently, at a high scientific and theoretical level, which reflects the deep theoretical knowledge and practical skills of the graduate, his ability to work as a scientist; 2) mastered the methods of research work in the collection and systematization of data, their processing, creative thinking, systematic presentation, formulation of conclusions; 3) showed a critical attitude to sources and literature, demonstrated scientific novelty, formulated their own proposals and practical recommendations; 4) competently, in compliance with the requirements of the state standard, issued a final qualifying work; 5) wrote the work competently, in the Ukrainian literary language, without allowing spelling, punctuation and stylistic errors; 6) on defense demonstrated deep knowledge of the research topic, firmly and confidently answered the questions of the commission members; 7) before the defense presented an extended annotation on the resource ResearchGate.net. A grade of "good" (80 points) is given if the graduate: 1) performed the work independently, at the appropriate scientific and theoretical level, which reflects a sufficiently high theoretical knowledge and practical skills of the graduate, his ability to work as a scientist; 2) mastered the methods of research work in the collection and systematization of data, their processing, creative thinking, systematic presentation, formulation of conclusions, allows minor violations of the logic and systematic presentation; 3) the work has a scientific novelty, but the author can not sufficiently analyze the literature and sources on the research topic, but formulated his own proposals and practical recommendations; 4) in compliance with the requirements of the state standard issued a master's thesis, but made 3-4 mistakes or inaccuracies; 5) wrote the work competently, in the Ukrainian literary language, while making single spelling, punctuation and stylistic errors; 6) on defense demonstrated deep knowledge of the research topic, answered questions from members of the commission. A grade of "satisfactory" (66 points) is given if the graduate: 1) performed the work independently, at a sufficient scientific and theoretical level, which reflects the theoretical knowledge and practical skills of the graduate, his ability to work as; 2) mastered the skills of research work in the collection and systematization of data, their processing, understanding, systematic presentation, formulation of conclusions, but allows violation of the logic and systematic presentation, uncritical attitude to documents and materials; 3) the work is mainly compilative, there are no elements of scientific novelty, vaguely worded or no own proposals and practical recommendations; 4) made a number of mistakes in the design of the work and its scientific and reference apparatus with deviations from the requirements of the state standard; 5) wrote the work in the Ukrainian literary language, but made a large number of spelling, punctuation and stylistic errors; 6) on defense demonstrated shallow knowledge of the research topic, failed to answer some questions of the commission members; 7) did not submit any publication to the defense. The grade "unsatisfactory" (up to 50 points) is given in the case when the student admitted to the defense of the qualification work is not guided by it at all, cannot answer any questions of the commission members, or it turns out that the work is plagiarism. The following gross errors were made in the work: 1. The content of the work does not correspond to the plan of qualification work or does not reveal the topic in full or in its main part. 2. The formulated sections (subsections) do not reflect the real problem situation, the state of the object. 3. The purpose of the study is not related to the problem, formulated in the abstract and does not reflect the specifics of the object and subject of research. 4. The author has not shown independence, the work is a compilation or plagiarism. 5. No in-depth and comprehensive analysis of modern official and regulatory documents, new special literature (last 2-10 years) on the research topic. 6. Analytical review of domestic and foreign publications on the topic has the form of an annotated list and does not reflect the level of research of the problem. 7. The end result does not meet the purpose of the study, the conclusions do not meet the objectives. 8. The paper does not contain references to primary sources or not those from which the material is borrowed. 9. Bibliographic description of sources in the list of used literature is given arbitrarily, without complying with the requirements of the state standard. 10. Tables, diagrams, schemes borrowed not from primary sources are used as illustrative material. 11. The scope and design of the work do not meet the requirements of the work performed sloppily, with errors.
Recommended books: -